Back to universe
SR
Speciality Restaurants
CSell / AvoidSPECIALITY · NSE · Small Cap · QSR / Casual Dining
QSR / Casual Dining
Fetching live…
₹230
1D 0.1%1M 0.5%1Y 0%
Fundamental (RQ-100)
51
Technical (TQ-100)
47
Valuation
55
Market cap
₹1.1K Cr
Live decision ratingCHold
Fundamental score breakdown
51/100Growth Quality
6.4 / 20
Rev 1Y 5.0%, 3Y CAGR 8.0%, 5Y CAGR 4.0%
Margin & Profitability
6.5 / 15
EBITDA 14.0%, PAT 4.0%
Return on Capital
9.0 / 20
ROCE 12.0%, ROE 8.0%
Cash Flow Quality
7.0 / 15
OCF/EBITDA 0.60
Leverage
8.0 / 10
ND/EBITDA 0.50
Reinvestment
6.0 / 8
Capex/Sales 4.0%
Accounting
4.0 / 7
Governance
4.0 / 5
Technical score breakdown
47/100Trend Structure
8.0 / 20
↓ 200 · ↓ 50 · ↓ 20
Momentum
8.0 / 15
1Y 0.0%, 1M 0.5%
Volume Dynamics
8.0 / 15
Vol30 —%
Relative Strength
8.0 / 15
1Y 0.0%
MA Cluster
5.0 / 10
Extension
5.0 / 10
—% from 50DMA
Volatility
4.0 / 8
Price Action
1.0 / 7
-100.0% from 52W H
Business
What this company actually does
Mainland China casual dining brand owner.
Stores
—
Dark stores
—
Cities
—
Listed status
Listed
Format exposure
How direct is this play?
Primary formatQSR / Casual Dining
Exposure typeDominant
Revenue visibilityMedium
Operating leverage stageScaling
Policy beneficiaryNone
Data confidenceMedium
Financial snapshot
Live · green dot = live, falls back to curated
Revenue
₹480 Cr
Rev 1Y growth
5%
Rev 3Y CAGR
8%
EBITDA margin
14.0%
PAT margin
4.0%
ROE
8%
ROCE
12%
OCF/EBITDA
0.60
Net Debt/EBITDA
0.5
Financial statements
Multi-year P&L, balance sheet, cash flow — scraped live from Screener.in
Fetching from Screener.in…
Loading…
Valuation
Live multiples + retail-specific (curated)
P/E
65
Forward P/E
55
EV/EBITDA
14
EV/Sales
2.0
P/B
3.0
FCF Yield
4.3%
Trading below 25× EV/EBITDA — relatively reasonable for this segment.
Investment thesis
AI-generated · always cite sources before acting
Bull
Long-runway TAM with structural tailwinds.
Base
Earnings growth of ~9% over the next 3 years assuming margins hold. Multiple compression risk if growth slows; multiple expansion possible if QSR / Casual Dining GMV outperforms.
Bear
Format-level risk: regulation, gig-cess, or competitive pressure compress contribution margin.
Variant perception
Consensus views Speciality Restaurants as a challenged player. Our differentiated take: execution risks remain underappreciated even after the price drawdown.
Key monitorables
- Quarterly EBITDA margin trajectory
- Revenue growth vs management guidance
- Capex vs store/dark-store adds
- Promoter holding and ESOP dilution
Peers
Same primary format · sorted by market cap